Lost-and-found transactions

With asynchronous updating, a transaction committed on the primary database server might not be replicated on the secondary database server. This situation can result if a failure occurs after the primary database server copies a commit record to the HDR buffer but before the primary database server sends that commit record to the secondary database server.

If the secondary database server is changed to a standard database server after a failure of the primary database server, it rolls back any open transactions. These transactions include any that were committed on the primary database server but for which the secondary database server did not receive a commit record. As a result, transactions are committed on the primary database server but not on the secondary database server. When you restart data replication after the failure, the database server places all the logical-log records from the lost transactions in a file (which the DRLOSTFOUND configuration parameter specifies) during logical recovery of the primary database server. The following figure illustrates the process.
Figure 1. Using a lost-and-found file
The paragraph that precedes this figure describes the content of the figure.

If the lost-and-found file is created on the computer that is running the primary database server after it restarts data replication, a transaction has been lost. The database server cannot reapply the transaction records in the lost-and-found file because conflicting updates might have occurred while the secondary database server was acting as a standard database server.

To reduce the risk of a lost transaction without running data replication in synchronous mode, use unbuffered logging for all the databases. This method reduces the amount of time between the writing and transfer of the transaction records from the primary database server to the secondary database server.

Copyright© 2018 HCL Technologies Limited